Adoption Diagnostic
Is this innovation actually ready to be adopted?
A structured assessment across evidence, clinical value, workflow, economics, trust, regulation, operational capacity and learning/scale.
Evidence
Weight 18% · Critical gate
Is the target clinical claim supported by evidence in the intended population and use setting?
Are outcomes clinically meaningful rather than only mechanistic or surrogate where not validated?
Are limitations, uncertainty, safety, and subgroup effects understood?
Can the evidence package withstand payer, clinician, regulator, and procurement review?
Clinical Value
Weight 14%
Does the product solve a clinically important problem with a clear place in care?
Is the intended user/patient population precisely defined?
Is the expected benefit large enough to change a real decision or outcome?
Is there a credible comparison against current care or alternatives?
Workflow Fit
Weight 12%
Can the innovation fit into current clinical workflows without excessive burden?
Are roles, handoffs, alerts, escalation, and follow-up responsibilities clear?
Does it integrate with EHR/data systems or provide an acceptable alternative?
Can clinicians understand and act on outputs at the right moment?
Economics & Payment
Weight 15%
Is there a viable reimbursement, budget, contracting, or value-based payment pathway?
Is the buyer's economic case quantified using the buyer's own relevant outcomes?
Are implementation, staffing, device, and integration costs included?
Does the model remain viable under plausible payment-policy changes?
Trust & Usability
Weight 10%
Do clinicians and patients understand what the innovation does and does not do?
Are explainability, informed use, accessibility, and human factors adequate?
Are claims disciplined and aligned with evidence?
Is there a credible process for issues, corrections, and user feedback?
Regulatory & Governance
Weight 12% · Critical gate
Is the regulatory status/pathway understood and appropriate to the intended use?
Are privacy, security, licensure, consent, and governance requirements addressed?
Are AI/device change-management and postmarket obligations addressed where relevant?
Are institutional approval and oversight pathways mapped?
Operational Capacity & Interoperability
Weight 10%
Can the organization deploy, support, train, monitor, and scale the innovation?
Are integration, data exchange, identity, security, and support dependencies resolved?
Is there sufficient clinical/technical staffing and implementation ownership?
Can the solution operate reliably across sites and populations?
Learning & Scale
Weight 9%
Are post-launch outcomes and safety/performance monitored?
Is there a feedback loop that changes product, protocol, or deployment when evidence changes?
Can results be compared across sites and populations?
Is there a credible path from pilot to repeatable institutional scale?